GMAT考试写作指导:Issue写作范文四七
分类: GRE-GMAT英语
47. The responsibility for preventing environmental damage should be shared by
government, private industry and individuals alike. The primary obligation, however,
belongs to individuals. Moreover, within organizations like the government or a
corporation, responsibility should be increasingly distributed to individuals according to
level of authority.
The primary obligation to preserve the environment belongs to individuals for the
reason that assigning responsibility to a government or corporation is problematic. This
is because abstract entities like these do not fulfill the usual criteria for being
responsible. An entity can shoulder responsibility only if it can be held accountable for
its actions. Furthermore, being held accountable for an action requires that the entity act
willingly and on the basis of conscious intentions. But governments and businesses are
abstractions, having neither will nor consciousness beyond that of the individuals within
them.
Still, we can make some sense of treating corporations and governments as if they
were individuals. They are individuals under the law, and therefore subject to laws,
penalties, and lawsuits. They can even be identified as beneficiaries in wills.
Nevertheless, when responsibility is vaguely allocated to abstract entities like
governments or corporations, it becomes easy for those within such organizations to
cover individual actions that result in devastation to the environment. Consider the
famous case of the Exxon Valdez accident and oil spill off the Alaskan coast. While it
was easy to single out Captain Hazelwood and determine his blameworthiness the night
of the mishap, it was not so easy to identify those responsible at higher levels. Someone
was responsible for hiring Hazelwood; others should have known about his drinking or
other job-related problems. Thus when we do assign responsibility to governments or
business organizations, it must be clearly distributed to individuals in relevant lines of
authority within the organization.
In conclusion, individuals are mainly responsible for protecting the environment.
And while it makes some sense in a vague way to talk about the similar responsibilities
of government and industry, in the end such obligations will belong to individuals
within them. Therefore, some individuals will assume greater shares of responsibility
for the environment, since they act in positions of authority on behalf of government or
industry.
government, private industry and individuals alike. The primary obligation, however,
belongs to individuals. Moreover, within organizations like the government or a
corporation, responsibility should be increasingly distributed to individuals according to
level of authority.
The primary obligation to preserve the environment belongs to individuals for the
reason that assigning responsibility to a government or corporation is problematic. This
is because abstract entities like these do not fulfill the usual criteria for being
responsible. An entity can shoulder responsibility only if it can be held accountable for
its actions. Furthermore, being held accountable for an action requires that the entity act
willingly and on the basis of conscious intentions. But governments and businesses are
abstractions, having neither will nor consciousness beyond that of the individuals within
them.
Still, we can make some sense of treating corporations and governments as if they
were individuals. They are individuals under the law, and therefore subject to laws,
penalties, and lawsuits. They can even be identified as beneficiaries in wills.
Nevertheless, when responsibility is vaguely allocated to abstract entities like
governments or corporations, it becomes easy for those within such organizations to
cover individual actions that result in devastation to the environment. Consider the
famous case of the Exxon Valdez accident and oil spill off the Alaskan coast. While it
was easy to single out Captain Hazelwood and determine his blameworthiness the night
of the mishap, it was not so easy to identify those responsible at higher levels. Someone
was responsible for hiring Hazelwood; others should have known about his drinking or
other job-related problems. Thus when we do assign responsibility to governments or
business organizations, it must be clearly distributed to individuals in relevant lines of
authority within the organization.
In conclusion, individuals are mainly responsible for protecting the environment.
And while it makes some sense in a vague way to talk about the similar responsibilities
of government and industry, in the end such obligations will belong to individuals
within them. Therefore, some individuals will assume greater shares of responsibility
for the environment, since they act in positions of authority on behalf of government or
industry.