LSAT考试中逻辑单题捷进大法
本捷进大法旨在为备考GMAT而苦于对其逻辑题(CR)十分怵头的考友排忧解难。
LSAT考试由四个SECTION组成，一个阅读理解，一个逻辑组题，剩下两个是逻辑单题。本
捷进大法主要讨论通过练习CRACK LSAT逻辑单题而达到CRACK GMAT逻辑题目的的理论、
方法、步骤、操作实例、注意事项等。
本来在下在复习GMAT时，对LSAT是很不屑一顾的（这样说也不对，应该叫很不以为然吧
），不过那天有个MM拿LSAT题让我帮她看看，硬着头皮做了两套，大概100道单题，突然
发现自己对老米的逻辑思路有了更深一层的认识。再拿出GMAT笔试真题以前做错的题，
发现自己以前错得“莫名其妙（十分愚蠢）”，而不少费费从答案倒推和自己牵强附会
的“解释”也是狗P不是。于是开始猛攻LSAT逻辑单题，颇有收获。总结了一些东西，希
望对大家有用。
有的大虾说LSAT逻辑要做上N遍才能有效果，我的经验则不然。在我看来，做一道题你就
赚一道题，这也是我写这篇东西的原因。考友们不妨有时间多作，没时间少做，能做尽
量做。至于LSAT是不是破解GMAT的九阴真经、葵花宝典，我就不敢打保票了。在使用本
捷进大法的过程中，如有任何疑问或对本贴有任何意见、建议，请发电邮至
gmatcracker@263.net
大家共同探讨。
□□□□所用复习材料□□□□
新东方出的两本“黄皮”，第一册上面有17套题，第二册上有11套题。这两本书在新东
方各教室门口小贩那里可以买得到，叫价一般是50-60块，讲讲价或几个人合买可以便宜
到40块或更少。黄皮的字迹不大清楚，看着费劲，如觉得有必要可结合新乐敦或润舒眼
药水或高倍放大镜使用。:)
（如买不到黄皮可用其替代品，如宇航出版社出的LSAT书，上有15套题，不过我不知道
是哪15套；也可与胜奇门联系订购其光盘版，没见过，大概是用黄皮扫描后存成PDF格式
的吧。）
新东方出的陈向东编的厚厚的《GRE GMAT LSAT逻辑推理》，里头有“精选”的80道LSA
T逻辑单题，并附有翻译和解释。（此书非必选项，有了黄皮可以不用买。）
□□□□LSAT逻辑题型与GMAT逻辑的异同□□□□
LSAT逻辑题型及典型问法：
△加强题(Which one of the following statements, if added as a premise to the
argument, would make the conclusion valid / strengthen the argument?; Which
one of the following, if true, would make the conclusion in the passage a l
ogical conclusion?; Which one of the following is an additional piece of inf
ormation that would support the conclusion?)
△削弱题(Which one of the following statements, if true, most clearly underm
ines / seriously weaken the conclusion / argument?; Which one of the followi
ng assertions, if true, provides the most effective challenge to the author’
s conclusion?)
△假设题(Which one of the following is an assumption on which the author’s
argument relies?; Which one of the following most accurately states a hidden
assumption that the author must make in order to advance the argument above
?; Which one of the following is a presupposition essential to the reasoning
in the passage above?)
△评价题(Which one of the following is the most accurate evaluation of the a
uthor’s reply?; Which one of the following principles, if valid, justifies
the author’s argument?; Which one of the following would it be most helpful
to know in order to evaluate the argument?)